Greg Prince's Blog

Musings and pontifications from a reality based progressive

Archive for the ‘Election 2012’ Category

An embarrassment to his tradition

Posted by Greg on September 26, 2012

I have a distant cousin with nearly the same name.  Generally the “fame” is relative and minimal, but sometimes it becomes amusing as during the last week or so when he’s been active in the media, saying some very good things with which I largely agree.  Of course, since our names are similar I also get both kudos and criticisms intended for him.  Makes me wonder if he got any hate mail for times I’ve been quoted in the media, or had things I’ve written show up on Time or on MSNBC.

At any rate, here’s the bottom line, and the areas in which Gregory A. Prince was right on track.

Coming down to the wire we see the Romney campaign becoming more and more desperate, more and more unhinged.  We also, though not by the campaigns design, been exposed to a plutocratic, social Darwinist attitude in the candidate that makes him, if anything, even less likable than previously thought.  It’s a problem, a real problem.

To this end a different Greg Prince – a distant cousin – wrote a scathing review in the Huffington Post, which was later picked up and expanded upon by Senator Harry Reid.

When the news of Mitt Romney’s Florida video broke on Monday evening, I was incensed — but not for its political implications. His arrogant and out-of-hand dismissal of half the population of this country struck me at a visceral level, for it sullied the religion that he and I share — the religion for which five generations of my ancestry have lived and sacrificed, the religion whose official mantra is “to take care of the poor and needy throughout the world.” My first impulse was to rent an airplane towing a banner: “Mitt Romney is Not the Face of Mormonism!”

Unlike my cousin, I have never been a supporter of Multiple Choice Mitt.  I might have supported him in the ninties when he was running for Senate against Ted Kennedy – and attacking him from the left.  But since then he’s gone so far off the deep end nobody knows what his beliefs are any more, that is if he has beliefs other than that he should be president.

But Romney’s confusion is typical of what we find on the religious right, and within the larger LDS community he and Harry Reid share. The prosperity gospel has combined with the nastiest form of Randian social Darwinism writ large.

And Jesus wept.

 

Posted in Election 2012, Politics in General | Leave a Comment »

All she wrote?

Posted by Greg on January 17, 2012

It’s looking as though Multiple Choice Mitt is nearing the end of the chase.  I stand corrected, I’d have never guessed a year ago that he could be the frontrunner. But given the state of the competition…  The not Mitts simply never came together, and even after the Christianist enclave last weekend in Texas, the partisans for Gingrich and Santorum still can’t get it together.

Interestingly, Romney seems to be coming up with his own google problem.  In honor of the family dog Seamus, to Romney means…well, follow the link.

 

Posted in Election 2012 | 3 Comments »

It’s about time

Posted by Greg on January 4, 2012

Recess appointments?  An actual legislative victory despite GOP brinkmanship?

It appears the president has found his balls.

And not a moment too soon.  It’s time to remind people why the GOP can’t be trusted with governance.

Posted in Election 2012, Obama Administration | Leave a Comment »

Someone get the popcorn

Posted by Greg on January 4, 2012

A frothy surprise has come out of Iowa.  Rick Santorum appears to have essentially tied for first in the first in the nation Iowa GOP Caucus.   Senator Frothy is neck and neck with Multiple Choice Mitt, having flipped for top all night.  At this point, with 99% reporting, Romney leads by one vote according to CNN.  It’s that close.

Jim Carville is right, they just don’t want to vote for Romney.

There is one screaming, huge story here tonight and that is these Republicans just don’t want to vote for Mitt Romney. I mean it’s like you’re trying to give a dog a pill. They keep spitting it up. Now, they’re going to eat the pill, ’cause Romney’s going to eventually be the nominee, but…

And it’s the same thing he had before and he’s got a weaker field. It just don’t matter where he comes in, they don’t want to vote for him.

Perhaps he overstates the case a bit, but Romney just doesn’t resonate with the base.  Or anyone else really.  He’s a boring John Kerry on the wrong side of the issues.

I used to think Romney would never be the nominee, I am rethinking this.  Not that the GOP suddenly likes him, but who else is there?  Santorum is the latest not Mitt, but he won’t have any staying power outside of a few places, like Iowa, where the GOP base is even crazier than normal.

But the GOP typically nominates the next guy in line, and this year it’s Romney.  That said, Gingrich isn’t going away yet, and Romney led the charge knocking him out of first place in Iowa, not to mention the national polls.  He’s quick on his feet and a good debater.  And while he isn’t likely to get the nomination, his sights are targeting Mitt right now.  It will be fun to watch.

Posted in Election 2012 | Leave a Comment »

This could be interesting

Posted by Greg on January 3, 2012

With 16 percent reporting:

Ron Paul 24%

Mitt Romney 23%

Rick Santorum 23%

I’ve wondered if Paul’s support isn’t understated in the polls.  This isn’t the kind of threeway Santorum likes to think about, but he probably is rather excited about it nonetheless.

Posted in Election 2012 | Leave a Comment »

And they’re off

Posted by Greg on January 3, 2012

Curiously enough, “off” can have multiple meanings.  And it does given this go around with the clown car that is the 2012 GOP Primary.

So what will it be?  Will Rick Santorum‘s frothy churn across Iowa finally bear fruit?  Will Romney prove you can indeed fool some of the people all of the time?  Will Ron Paul actually win something outside his own district?

Time will tell.

And it doesn’t matter.  The GOP gives the nomination to the next guy in line.  And this time, it’s Multiple Choice Mitt.  Not because he’s who they want, but because he’s the only one there who isn’t batshit insane.  Other than Huntsman, who simply isn’t going to get any traction this go around.

Posted in Election 2012 | Leave a Comment »

Presidential pretentions

Posted by Greg on April 12, 2011

Hm

An exploratory committee indeed.

Hey Mitt, here’s celebrating the five year anniversary of your version of Obamacare in Massachussets.  I’m sure the radical right is really happy with that.

 

 

Posted in Election 2012 | Leave a Comment »

Gearing for a delusional 2012

Posted by Greg on January 6, 2011

Delusions of adequacy, no other way to explain it.

With the newly sworn Congress barely in session we are well into the horserace leading up to the 2012 presidential election.  Chronologically we’re entering the third year or “autumn” of the cycle and appropriately the nuts are starting to fall from the trees.

Thus far the Obama administration has governed differently than candidate Obama campaigned, frustrating progressives and liberals and compromising away hoped for policy gains.  Given both disappointment among the base and the slow pace of economic recovery, especially unemployment, you’d think the President would be particularly vulnerable to a primary opponent.  Certainly, some on the left would welcome the prospect of a Democratic primary, but at this point it doesn’t seem likely.

The water is a bit muddied by the successful lame duck session which demonstrated  that once in a rare while Democrats can accomplish something, yet generates a sense of frustration and wondering where that can-do competence has been the previous two years.

Frustrations notwithstanding, a credible primary challenge on the left seems increasingly unlikely.  That leaves the GOP side of the aisle where the excitement is to be found.

Starting with a blast from the insufficiently distant past, CNN reports that former Senator Frothy, Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, is making preparations for a 2012 White House run.

A source close to the former senator from Pennsylvania confirms to CNN that later Wednesday Santorum will announced [sic] that he’s bringing on board one of the top GOP political strategists in New Hampshire, a state that plays a crucial role in the race for the White House. Santorum will also next week make another visit to the state, which traditionally holds in nation’s first primary in the presidential calendar.

Haven’t we suffered enough?  It’s hard to imagine a world in which a Santorum candidacy would be taken seriously, but then I look at the current House of Representatives and wonder if he isn’t an ideal stealth candidate.  He’s got the social conservative bonafides Multiple Choice Mitt lacks.  He was a wingnut before teabagging asshattery was cool and the public at large doesn’t have the longest of memories.

But things could be even more entertaining.  Gazing northward from my comfortable home in Minnesota’s Fourth Congressional District, we find the sixth district, a rather “special” place represented by the always entertaining (usually not deliberately so) Michele Bachmann.

Michele Bachmann is always unpredictable – her logic isn’t like other people’s logic.  There was speculation she would consider taking on Minnesota’s senior senator Amy Klobuchar who stands for reelection in 2012.  It turns out Bachmann’s ambitions may be a bit more grand in scale:

MinnPost has learned that Bachmann loyalists have already begun holding conversations with activists and officials in key early caucus and primary states and will begin travelling to those states in the coming weeks and months. Internal conversations have already begun about who might leave her Washington and district offices to staff a potential bid. And Bachmann told reporters she will likely visit additional early voting states in the upcoming months.

I have to admit this is a bit mind numbing.  Bachmann’s ability to raise vast sums of money, mostly from out of state, was demonstrated in the 2010 election but that’s not the same thing as a national draw for votes.  Bachmann’s idiocy is a known quantity in the Sixth and they vote for her anyway.  It’s probably a mistake to think Americans nationwide, even a majority of GOP voters, are equally forgiving.

There is yet some amusement value to be had here.  The GOP leadership created the monster.  As Hot Air observes, “A ‘Palin vs. Bachmann’ storyline in the primaries would be the political event of a lifetime.”  Yeah, it would.  The GOP leadership has fed the teabagging beast for electoral advantage, praying all the while they could keep it under control.  But the beast doesn’t want to be controlled.

When Bachmann stopped having her way with GOP leadership in the Minnesota Senate, she launched her quixotic bid for Congress in the Sixth.  Bachmann aspires to leadership, having recently formed the Tea Party Caucus in the House of Representatives and campaigned actively for far right candidates in the 2010 season. Not only were her attempts to secure a leadership position within the House GOP were solidly rebuffed, she was denied a desired seat on the Ways and Means Committee, to be placed on the Intelligence Committee.  Now in principle the Intelligence Committee is prestigious, but it’s also a committee that by nature of its work is often out of the limelight – something troublesome for Bachmann who follows TV cameras like a moth to flame.

Rep. Keith Ellison had this to say about Michele Bachmann’s possible candidacy:

I think it would be great for her to run for president. I think she has strongly-held views which she should test on the whole of the United States – see how her views are received across the country, not just in the comfort of the 6th District.

It certainly could be educational:

I think her views would not match up with the mainstream of American society, but I do encourage her to try it, I think it would be a very good thing for her to get out there  – and maybe she should resign from office now so she can devote all her time to her presidential run.

Educational indeed, this has potential for some great political theater.  Please Michele….please GOP.

Posted in Congress, Election 2012 | Leave a Comment »

Couldn’t happen to a nicer whack job

Posted by Greg on September 8, 2010

It appears that former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum is worked himself into a frothy mixture over what’s being described as a “Google” problem.

Mother Jones elaborates:

Rick Santorum would very much like to be president. For the past few years, he has been diligently appearing at the sorts of conservative events—the Values Voters Summit, the Conservative Political Action Conference—where aspiring Republican candidates are expected to show up. But before he starts printing “Santorum 2012” bumper stickers, there’s one issue the former GOP senator and his strategists need to address. You see, Santorum has what you might call a Google problem. For voters who decide to look him up online, one of the top three search results is usually the site SpreadingSantorum.com, which explains that Santorum’s last name is a sexual neologism for “the frothy mixture of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.”

Santorum’s problem got its start back in 2003, when the then-senator from Pennsylvania compared homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia, saying the “definition of marriage” has never included “man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be.” The ensuing controversy prompted syndicated sex columnist Dan Savage, who’s gay, to start a contest, soliciting reader suggestions for slang terms to “memorialize the scandal.” The winner came up with the “frothy mixture” idea, Savage launched a website, and a meme was born. Even though mainstream news outlets would never link to it, Savage’s site rose in the Google rankings, thanks in part to bloggers who posted Santorum-related news on the site or linked to it from their blogs. Eventually it eclipsed Santorum’s own campaign site in search results; some observers even suggested it may have contributed to Santorum’s crushing 18-point defeat in his 2006 campaign against Bob Casey.

Yep, I recall it well, as well as the hundreds of times I’ve linked Santorum‘s name to Savage’s site myself.  And encouraged others to do so.  Savage hasn’t updated the site in years, but I’m sure he’ll become much more active if little Ricky throws his hat in the ring.

Posted in Election 2012, The Right | Leave a Comment »

Mitt flip flops

Posted by Greg on April 2, 2009

Again.  This time on immigration.

Posted in Culture War, Election 2012 | Leave a Comment »

Jindal indeed.

Posted by Greg on March 18, 2009

THIS is a strong contender for 2012? Oh yes, bring it on.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Jindal indeed.“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Culture War, Election 2012, Religious Wrong, The Right | Leave a Comment »

Multiple Choice Mitt still drawing ire on the right

Posted by Greg on October 30, 2008

It seems the wingnut caucus isn’t fond of his criticisms of Palin.

Recently, an influential conservative blogger (name withheld) outlined for me the reasons why the Romney 2008 campaign faltered.  One factor was the ”go nuclear” approach the campaign took with the competing GOP candidates.  The Romney campaign angered supporters of the other candidates to such a degree that their second choice for nominee was, “anyone but Romney”.

I had expected that the CEO of the SLC Olympics had learned from the mistakes of his campaign, but history seems to be repeating itself.  Romney has never ceased his campaign for President of the United States and although he has campaigned hard for John McCain, it appears as if this display of teamwork has been entirely for self-promoting reasons.  Romney and his supporters are now targeting their only serious 2012 challenger, Governor Sarah Palin.

Posted in Election 2012, The Right | Leave a Comment »